Digital Photography Review (DPR) provides very good evaluation reports. News are fresh, lots of info.

At DPR all the intermediate "sample" images are downsampled AND edited, be aware of this. Much better way to present a smaller image area would be to show a cropped portion from the real camera images with absolutely no image editing. Now as it is one must always download the full image in order to see the real camera performance.

DPR calibrate their monitors gamma 2.2 be aware of this. They shows a 26 patch grayswatch (at the bottom of this page) as a calibration tool. On gamma 2.2 calibrated system this swatch is strongly non-uniform, the difference between the A and B steps is minimal, Y and Z patches appear as pure black, strongest visual significance is seen in the range from Q patch to W patch. This swatch suffers from the slew rate and stabilizing time problems of CRT monitors that strongly accentuates the edge/change between the steps giving the illusion that there would be such a difference also between the actual surfaces of the patches.

In case your computer is not calibrated to gamma 2.2 using AdobeGamma utility, Color Vision OptiCal or similar monitor calibration software/hardware your gamma space is 2.5 in case of a Windows system (and 1.72 in case of Mac system). This means that on Windows system you see the images somewhat darker than how the DPReview people see them (and on Mac you see them a great deal lighter).

Normal uncalibrated PC systems all have gamma 2.5 space, there DPR graywedge is even more uniform. In any case do not adjust your monitor in such way that you discern all the steps in the DPR grayscale, it will be a very incorrect setting with way too high blackpoint.

Sample photos are real camera shots. News are fresh, lot of info.